- Choice no-fault state: PA drivers choose between "limited tort" and "full tort" insurance at policy purchase
- Modified comparative fault: 51% bar — plaintiff at 51%+ at fault cannot recover (42 Pa.C.S. § 7102)
- Statute of limitations: 2 years from date of accident (42 Pa.C.S. § 5524)
- Limited tort: significantly restricts non-economic damages unless injuries are "serious" — defined by statute
Pennsylvania's auto insurance system is unique: it is a "choice no-fault" state where every insured driver chooses between two coverage options at the time they purchase insurance. Choosing "limited tort" costs less in premiums but restricts the driver's right to sue for pain and suffering unless injuries meet the statutory definition of "serious." Choosing "full tort" preserves all rights to sue but costs more. This choice, made when purchasing insurance, follows the driver and affects recovery rights in every future accident — including accidents where another driver is at fault.
Full Tort vs. Limited Tort: Pennsylvania's Choice System
Under 75 Pa.C.S. § 1705, Pennsylvania drivers elect tort coverage at the time of insurance purchase:
- Full tort: preserves the right to sue for all damages, including non-economic damages (pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life), without any threshold requirement. Full tort policyholders pay higher premiums.
- Limited tort: the driver retains the right to sue for economic damages (medical bills, lost wages) but waives the right to sue for non-economic damages unless the injury qualifies as a "serious injury" under 75 Pa.C.S. § 1702: death; serious impairment of a body function; or permanent serious disfigurement.
The "serious impairment of a body function" standard is litigated frequently. Pennsylvania courts have interpreted it as requiring that the impairment affect the person's ability to lead a normal life in a significant way — not merely that the injury is painful. A limited tort plaintiff who cannot prove their injury meets the serious threshold cannot recover pain and suffering even from a 100% at-fault driver. Importantly: regardless of the plaintiff's own tort election, if the at-fault driver was uninsured, was under the influence, or was fleeing a crime scene, limited tort restrictions are waived and the plaintiff has full tort rights.
Modified Comparative Fault: 51% Bar
Pennsylvania's comparative negligence statute (42 Pa.C.S. § 7102) bars recovery when the plaintiff's negligence is greater than the combined negligence of the defendants — effectively a 51% bar. Below 50%, recovery is permitted but reduced proportionally. The 51% rule means a plaintiff who is exactly 50% at fault can still recover 50% of damages; at 51%, recovery is barred. Pennsylvania juries apportion fault among all parties, including the plaintiff, and the percentage is the governing factor for recovery and amount.
Pennsylvania's Mandatory First-Party Benefits
Even under Pennsylvania's choice system, all drivers must carry first-party benefits (FPB) — no-fault coverage that pays your own medical expenses regardless of fault. The minimum required FPB is $5,000 for medical expenses. Many policyholders elect higher FPB limits ($25,000 or $100,000) or income loss coverage. FPB claims are filed with your own insurer within 30 days of the accident and pay without regard to who was at fault. The FPB system means that regardless of the tort election, initial medical expenses are covered promptly without litigation.
Need legal documents after an accident?
Demand letters, release forms, and settlement agreements — ready in minutes.
Sponsored links. Affiliate disclosure · Compare all options