Two procedural requirements distinguish Colorado medical malpractice cases from litigation in surrounding states before a single deposition is taken or a court date is set. First, a Colorado plaintiff who files a medical malpractice complaint must simultaneously file — or file within 60 days — a Certificate of Review (C.R.S. § 13-20-602). The Certificate is signed by the plaintiff's attorney certifying that the attorney has consulted with a qualified expert in the same field as the defendant healthcare provider and that the expert has concluded there is a substantial basis for bringing the malpractice claim. The Certificate is not the expert's affidavit — it is the attorney's certification that the expert consultation occurred. Failure to file a Certificate of Review results in the complaint being dismissed. This requirement filters out malpractice claims that have not been reviewed by a medical expert before filing, but it also imposes a timing constraint on Colorado plaintiffs: the expert review must be complete before filing, which means investigation must begin promptly after a malpractice event. Second, Colorado's 2-year statute of limitations from discovery (with a 3-year hard repose from the date of the act or omission) runs during the time the expert is being retained and the Certificate is being prepared — creating a compressed timeline for Colorado malpractice claims investigation.
Colorado's malpractice damages caps (C.R.S. § 13-64-302) set a $300,000 limit on non-economic damages (pain and suffering, disfigurement, loss of enjoyment of life) and a $1,000,000 limit on total damages from all malpractice claims against any one provider arising from the same occurrence. These caps were challenged as unconstitutional — the Colorado Supreme Court upheld them in Garhart v. Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp., 95 P.3d 571 (Colo. 2004), finding the legislature had a rational basis for imposing caps to contain medical malpractice insurance costs and protect healthcare access in Colorado. The $1,000,000 total cap means that even a catastrophically injured patient — permanent paralysis from a surgical error, for instance — faces a hard ceiling on the total tort recovery. Unlike Maryland's single non-economic cap without a combined total cap, or Wisconsin's non-economic cap with separate economic damage uncapped, Colorado's dual-cap structure limits both categories of non-economic damages AND applies an overall combined ceiling. Economic damages (past and future medical expenses, lost wages, rehabilitation costs) are included in the $1M total cap — not separately uncapped as in some states.
Need legal documents for a malpractice claim?
Medical records requests, demand letters, and HIPAA release forms.
Sponsored links. Affiliate disclosure · Compare all options