South Carolina pre-litigation mediation — what is the Notice of Intent and 90-day process?

SC medical malpractice NOI and pre-litigation mediation (§ 15-79-110 et seq.): (1) Notice of Intent (NOI): before filing a medical malpractice lawsuit, the claimant must serve a formal NOI on each healthcare provider they intend to sue. The NOI must: identify the claimant; describe the alleged conduct by the healthcare provider; be served by certified mail, return receipt requested, or by personal service on each defendant. The NOI triggers the 90-day pre-litigation mediation period; (2) 90-day clock: from the date of service of the NOI, the parties have 90 days to attempt mediation before a certified mediator. The lawsuit cannot be filed during this 90-day period; (3) Statute of limitations tolling: the 3-year statute of limitations for the underlying malpractice claim is tolled (paused) during the 90-day NOI/mediation period. A claimant who serves the NOI 2 years and 10 months after the malpractice act has effectively extended their filing window for the 90 days; (4) Mediation requirements: mediation must be conducted by a certified mediator agreed upon by both parties (or selected by the court if the parties cannot agree). All parties and their insurance representatives must attend with settlement authority. The mediation is confidential — statements made in mediation cannot be used at trial; (5) If mediation fails: if the parties do not reach a settlement during the 90-day mediation period, the claimant may proceed to file the lawsuit in Circuit Court. The lawsuit must still comply with the expert affidavit requirement of § 15-36-100 (see below); (6) MUSC/government defendant distinction: if the defendant is a government entity — MUSC (state institution), a county hospital, or a municipal health clinic — a separate notice requirement under the South Carolina Tort Claims Act may also apply, in addition to the § 15-79-110 NOI. The SCTCA notice must be filed within 2 years with the relevant government entity before the lawsuit is filed.

South Carolina expert affidavit requirement — § 15-36-100 and dismissal consequences

SC expert affidavit (§ 15-36-100) in medical malpractice: (1) When required: within 45 days of filing a professional negligence complaint (including medical malpractice), the plaintiff must file with the court an affidavit of an expert witness. The 45-day clock begins from the date the complaint is filed in Circuit Court — not from service on the defendant; (2) What the affidavit must contain: the expert must affirmatively state: (a) the applicable standard of care; (b) the acts or omissions by the defendant that deviated from that standard of care; and (c) how the deviation caused the plaintiff's injury. Generic statements — 'the defendant failed to meet the standard of care' without specifying WHAT standard or HOW it was violated — are insufficient; (3) Expert qualification: the expert must be a licensed healthcare provider in the same field as the defendant (or a related field for overlapping standards). For a cardiac surgery malpractice case, the expert must be a qualified cardiac surgeon or cardiothoracic specialist; (4) Failure consequence: failure to file a conforming § 15-36-100 affidavit within 45 days of the complaint results in mandatory dismissal with prejudice. The South Carolina courts have enforced this strictly. A complaint filed without a timely, substantive expert affidavit is dismissed and the claim cannot be refiled; (5) Comparison to SC's pre-litigation process: the plaintiff faces two sequential expert requirements — (a) before the NOI is served, a medical expert should have reviewed the records to support the mediation position; (b) within 45 days of filing the lawsuit, the formal § 15-36-100 expert affidavit must be on file. These are separate requirements with separate deadlines; (6) Extension for good cause: a court may grant a 30-day extension to the 45-day expert affidavit deadline for good cause shown. This extension is not automatic — the plaintiff must demonstrate diligent efforts to obtain the affidavit and a specific reason for the inability to comply within 45 days.

South Carolina non-economic damages cap — how does the $350,000 / $1.05M limit work in practice?

SC malpractice non-economic cap (§ 15-32-220): (1) The cap structure: $350,000 non-economic damages cap per defendant; $1,050,000 maximum total non-economic damages regardless of how many defendants are sued. Non-economic damages include: pain and suffering, mental anguish, emotional distress, disfigurement, loss of consortium, loss of enjoyment of life; (2) Economic damages uncapped: medical expenses (past and future), lost wages and earning capacity, and future care costs are not subject to the cap. For a catastrophically injured patient requiring lifetime nursing care, economic damages can reach $5-10 million — the non-economic cap is a small fraction of the total recovery; (3) Single vs. multiple defendant cases: a case against a solo physician at a private practice: $350K non-economic maximum. A case against a hospital system + surgeon + anesthesiologist: $350K each, up to $1.05M total. This structure incentivizes naming multiple defendants where there is factual basis, to maximize the non-economic recovery ceiling; (4) MUSC exception: MUSC (a state university hospital) is a government entity subject to the SC Tort Claims Act (§ 15-78-120) rather than § 15-32-220. Under the SCTCA, government liability is capped at $300K per claimant / $600K per occurrence. A malpractice case at MUSC faces a LOWER damages ceiling than a case at private Prisma Health or MUSC Health (affiliated community hospitals), creating an anomaly in the system; (5) Prisma Health comparison: Prisma Health (Greenville Health System / Palmetto Health merged system) is a private nonprofit — its malpractice claims fall under the § 15-32-220 cap structure, not the SCTCA. Prisma operates Greenville Memorial Hospital (Level I trauma, Greenville County) and Prisma Health Richland (Columbia) as major referral centers; (6) Cap challenged: South Carolina medical malpractice plaintiffs challenged the constitutionality of the § 15-32-220 cap. South Carolina courts have upheld the cap as a valid exercise of legislative authority — unlike some states (e.g., Illinois, where the supreme court struck down the cap as unconstitutional). The SC cap remains in effect.

MUSC Charleston malpractice — how do government entity rules change the claim?

Medical University of South Carolina malpractice claims: (1) MUSC's legal status: MUSC is a public research university and state agency of South Carolina. As a government entity, MUSC and its employed physicians are protected by the South Carolina Tort Claims Act (§ 15-78-10 et seq.) — not the private medical malpractice framework. The SCTCA caps government malpractice liability at $300,000 per claimant / $600,000 per occurrence; (2) MUSC Health community hospitals: MUSC has expanded through affiliations and the MUSC Health system. Some affiliated community hospitals may be separately incorporated private entities that are NOT government agencies — malpractice at those facilities would fall under § 15-32-220 rather than the SCTCA. Whether a specific MUSC-affiliated hospital or clinic is a government agency or a private entity requires careful analysis; (3) SCTCA notice vs. § 15-79-110 NOI: a claimant suing MUSC must file: (a) a SCTCA pre-suit notice (§ 15-78-100) with MUSC within 2 years of the malpractice — this is a separate document from the § 15-79-110 NOI; and (b) the § 15-79-110 NOI at least 90 days before filing. Both requirements must be met. Missing either one bars the claim; (4) Immunity exceptions under SCTCA: the SCTCA preserves immunity for discretionary functions. A MUSC administrator's policy decision about how to staff a residency program may be a discretionary function immune from liability. A MUSC attending physician's negligent treatment decision is ministerial (not discretionary) and falls within SCTCA liability; (5) Wrongful death against MUSC: a wrongful death claim against MUSC is also subject to the SCTCA's $300K/$600K cap — a death at MUSC from physician malpractice is capped at $300,000 per claimant, regardless of the victim's age, future earnings, or the surviving family's loss; (6) Unique cases from MUSC's referral role: MUSC serves as South Carolina's primary center for organ transplantation, high-risk obstetrics, and pediatric subspecialty care. Cases involving delayed referral to MUSC — a community hospital that should have transferred a patient to MUSC sooner — can generate malpractice claims against the community hospital for the delayed transfer, with the community hospital potentially subject to § 15-32-220 caps while MUSC as the receiving institution is subject to SCTCA.

South Carolina medical malpractice SOL — 3 years but with important minor and discovery rules

SC malpractice statute of limitations (§ 15-3-545): (1) Standard SOL: 3 years from the date of the act or omission, or 3 years from the date the claimant discovered (or should have discovered) both the injury and its causal connection to the healthcare provider's conduct. The discovery rule is SC's recognition that malpractice is sometimes latent — a surgical error that is not discovered until a follow-up reveals a retained sponge, for example; (2) No absolute repose for adults: South Carolina does not have a medical malpractice statute of repose for adult patients. A patient who discovers malpractice 8 years after the event may still have 3 years from discovery to file — there is no outer wall comparable to Wisconsin's 10-year repose or Minnesota's 7-year repose; (3) Minor SOL: for children under 18 at the time of the malpractice, the SOL does not begin until the child turns 13 OR 7 years from the date of the act, whichever is later. A child who is 5 years old at the time of malpractice has until age 12 (7 years from age 5) OR until age 16 (13 + 3 years), whichever is greater — they have until age 16 to file. A newborn whose malpractice occurs at birth has until age 10 (7 years from birth) OR age 16 (13 + 3), whichever is later — they have until age 16; (4) Wrongful death from malpractice: the wrongful death claim arising from fatal malpractice has a separate 3-year SOL running from the date of death, which may be different from the personal injury malpractice SOL that ran from the date of the act; (5) Fraudulent concealment: if a healthcare provider fraudulently conceals the malpractice — affirmatively misleading the patient about what occurred — the SOL may be tolled by the fraudulent concealment until the patient discovers or should have discovered the truth; (6) Interaction with NOI/mediation deadline: serving the § 15-79-110 NOI tolls the SOL during the 90-day mediation period. A claimant who is approaching the SOL deadline should serve the NOI well before the deadline to ensure the tolling applies.

Medical Malpractice Laws in South Carolina (2026)

South Carolina Medical Malpractice strategy: medication-order trail, diagnostic-delay timeline, and where early mistakes cost the most

Clearer statewide medical malpractice guidance for South Carolina built around medication-order trail, the review moments that actually change outcomes, and the official path readers usually need first.

Reviewed January 2026 2 min read Official-source grounded Ver en Espanol En Español

Key Takeaways

Pre-litigation mediation required (§ 15-79-110): NOI must be served 90 days BEFORE filing; mandatory mediation during 90-day period; SOL tolled during 90 days; mediation confidential; only after mediation fails can lawsuit be filed — expert review should precede NOI service
Expert affidavit (§ 15-36-100): within 45 days of FILING (not NOI); signed by qualified expert; must specify exact standard + breach + causal mechanism; failure = dismissal WITH PREJUDICE; 30-day extension for good cause; two separate expert deadlines (NOI mediation support + 45-day affidavit)
Non-economic cap: $350K per defendant / $1.05M total max (§ 15-32-220); economic damages uncapped (future care often $5-10M in catastrophic cases); MUSC exception = SCTCA $300K/$600K (government entity, LOWER ceiling); Prisma Health (private) = § 15-32-220 caps
SOL: 3yr from act or discovery (§ 15-3-545); NO adult repose wall (unlike MN 7yr, WI 10yr); minor SOL: until age 13 + 3yr = age 16, or 7yr from act, whichever later; wrongful death from malpractice = separate 3yr SOL from death date; fraudulent concealment tolls
MUSC Charleston: state university = SCTCA defendant; $300K/$600K cap; separate 2-yr SCTCA pre-suit notice PLUS § 15-79-110 NOI both required; delayed referral TO MUSC = community hospital liability under § 15-32-220 caps; organ transplant/high-risk OB/pediatric specialty

Key Numbers — South Carolina All 50 states →

Filing Deadline 3 years

Fault Rule Modified Comparative

Insurance System At-Fault

Key Statute S.C. Code Ann. § 15-3-530

Compare with another state → Official source ↗

Before a medical malpractice lawsuit can be filed in South Carolina, the claimant must navigate a mandatory pre-litigation process that distinguishes South Carolina from most other states in the Southeast. Under S.C. Code Ann. § 15-79-110 et seq., a potential medical malpractice claimant must serve a formal Notice of Intent (NOI) on each prospective defendant at least ninety days before filing the lawsuit. The NOI must identify the claimant, describe the alleged conduct, and be served properly. Upon service of the NOI, the parties enter a mandatory ninety-day period during which they must attempt mediation before a certified mediator. Only if mediation fails to resolve the claim can the lawsuit be filed. This pre-litigation mediation requirement is not merely procedural — it substantially affects the economics and strategy of South Carolina medical malpractice litigation. Cases that can be resolved in pre-litigation mediation avoid the substantial costs of expert preparation, depositions, and trial. However, the mediation period also places a premium on early expert development: by the time the claimant serves the NOI, they should already have retained a qualified medical expert who has reviewed the records and formed opinions on breach and causation, because the ninety-day clock moves quickly and mediation will be unproductive without substantive expert support.

South Carolina caps non-economic damages in medical malpractice cases at $350,000 per defendant, with a total non-economic cap of $1,050,000 regardless of how many defendants are named in the action, under § 15-32-220. Economic damages — medical expenses, lost wages, future care costs — are uncapped. This per-defendant structure means that a single-defendant case (a solo practitioner surgeon, a single clinic) is capped at $350,000 in non-economic damages, while a multi-defendant case involving a hospital, a surgeon, and an anesthesiologist can reach the $1.05 million total cap. The cap does not apply to economic damages, which in catastrophic malpractice cases (permanent brain damage from anesthesia error, wrongful paralysis from surgical error) can dwarf the non-economic cap. At the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) in Charleston — the state's only academic medical center and a Level I trauma center that handles the most complex cases statewide — malpractice claims against the institution invoke the South Carolina Tort Claims Act's separate governmental liability cap ($300K/$600K per occurrence) rather than the § 15-32-220 private-entity cap, creating a different damages ceiling for MUSC cases than for Prisma Health or other private system cases.

Need legal documents for a malpractice claim?

Medical records requests, demand letters, and HIPAA release forms.

LawDepot 150+ state-specific legal documents Free trial · From $33/mo

Create Document →

ULF

US Legal Forms State-specific legal forms From $14.95

Browse Forms →

Sponsored links. Affiliate disclosure · Compare all options