North Dakota holds a singular place in American DUI jurisprudence: the state was the named defendant in Birchfield v. North Dakota, 579 U.S. 438 (2016), the United States Supreme Court decision that held warrantless breath testing incident to a DUI arrest is constitutionally permissible as a search incident to arrest, but warrantless blood draws are not. The original North Dakota law that criminalized refusal to submit to a blood draw was the statutory provision before the Court. That ruling, which restructured implied consent law in every state, came from a prosecution that began when Danny Birchfield, arrested for DUI in Morton County south of Bismarck, refused a blood test. Understanding how North Dakota DUI law has been shaped by — and continues to respond to — that Supreme Court precedent is foundational for any driver, employer, or attorney dealing with impaired-driving charges in the state.
North Dakota's core DUI statute is NDCC sec. 39-08-01, which prohibits operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, a controlled substance, or a combination of substances, or while having a blood alcohol concentration of .08 or more by weight. Separate BAC thresholds apply to commercial driver's license (CDL) holders (.04) and persons under age twenty-one (.02). First-offense DUI is a Class B misdemeanor carrying up to thirty days in jail, a fine of $500 to $1,500, and a ninety-one-day driver's license suspension. Second offense within seven years is a Class A misdemeanor with up to one year in jail, a fine up to $3,000, and a one-year license suspension. A third offense within seven years is a Class C felony with up to five years imprisonment, a fine up to $10,000, and a two-year suspension. Fourth and subsequent offenses carry a Class C felony designation with a four-year suspension. The North Dakota Department of Transportation (608 East Boulevard Avenue, Bismarck) administers the administrative license suspension process separately from the criminal case — the administrative case runs on its own parallel track and must be separately contested.
The DataMaster DMT is the North Dakota Highway Patrol's approved evidentiary breath testing instrument. Proper maintenance, calibration records, and operator certification are required for the result to be admissible in court, and defense challenges to DataMaster DMT calibration logs and the administering officer's certification status are standard practice. Blood draws, when authorized by warrant or consent post-Birchfield, are analyzed at the State Health Laboratory (2635 East Main Avenue, Bismarck); chain-of-custody documentation and laboratory protocols are subject to defense review. Drug-impaired driving prosecutions under NDCC sec. 39-08-01(1)(a)(2) rely on Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) evaluations by specially trained North Dakota Highway Patrol officers who apply a twelve-step protocol developed by NHTSA to detect impairment by cannabis, methamphetamine, opioids, and other controlled substances when BAC is below .08.
North Dakota's implied consent law (NDCC sec. 39-08-01) requires that any person who operates a motor vehicle in North Dakota is deemed to have consented to chemical testing of their breath, blood, or urine upon lawful arrest for DUI. Refusal to submit to a breath test remains a criminal offense — a separate Class B misdemeanor with enhanced license revocation penalties — because breath testing was upheld as constitutionally permissible under Birchfield. Refusal to submit to a blood draw, however, cannot be criminalized without a warrant or valid consent following the Supreme Court's ruling. Law enforcement in North Dakota now routinely apply for telephonic search warrants for blood draws when drivers refuse breath testing, a process that Cass County and Burleigh County courts have established efficient procedures to handle within forty-five minutes of the arrest. A driver who refuses both breath and blood testing while law enforcement seeks a blood draw warrant faces the criminal refusal charge plus the officer's observations and field sobriety test performance as evidence.
North Dakota has expanded DUI-specialty treatment courts as alternatives to incarceration. The Fargo DUI Court (Cass County District Court), Bismarck DUI Court (Burleigh County), and Grand Forks DUI Court operate intensive supervision programs combining frequent check-ins, monitored sobriety testing, and substance use treatment with the possibility of reduced criminal penalties upon completion. Eligibility typically requires no prior violent offenses and a diagnosed alcohol use disorder. The 24/7 Sobriety Program — developed in South Dakota and adopted in modified form by North Dakota — subjects participants to twice-daily breath testing as a condition of pretrial release or probation, with immediate jail placement for any positive test. Ignition interlock devices are required for all second and subsequent DUI convictions under NDCC sec. 39-06.1-10, and courts increasingly impose interlocks for first-time convictions involving high BAC results or accidents causing injury. CDL holders face the most severe consequences: a first DUI results in a one-year federal disqualification (3 years if transporting hazardous materials), and a second DUI results in lifetime CDL disqualification — career-ending consequences for the thousands of oilfield truck drivers operating in Williams and McKenzie counties who carry commercial licenses.
Sobriety checkpoints have been upheld in North Dakota under the state Supreme Court's application of the Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 (1990), framework, though operational requirements — advance publicity, systematic vehicle stops, and supervisory oversight — must be strictly followed. The North Dakota Highway Patrol operates checkpoints primarily on holiday weekends and during periods of elevated impaired-driving incidents, particularly on I-29 north of Fargo toward the Pembina border crossing and on US-83 in Bismarck. Grand Forks International Airport (4000 Airport Drive) and Hector International Airport in Fargo are locations where law enforcement coordinates with taxi and rideshare services to intercept impaired travelers, and a DUI arrest near either facility may involve both state and municipal jurisdiction depending on where the offense occurred.
Need legal documents for your traffic case?
Hardship license requests, hearing prep forms, and correspondence — state-specific.
Sponsored links. Affiliate disclosure · Compare all options